Other Links
Editorial Board
- UK Editors
 - Roger Jones and John Quinn
 
 Editors for The Americas - Bruce Hodges and Jonathan Spencer Jones
 
 European Editors - Bettina Mara and Jens F Laurson
 
 Consulting Editor - Bill Kenny
 
 Assistant Webmaster -Stan Metzger
 
 Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
   
SEEN AND HEARD UK CONCERT REVIEW
Stravinsky - Symphony in Three Movements
Strauss - Four Last Songs
Beethoven - Symphony no.6 in F major, op.68
    
    Only a tone-deaf fool could doubt Stravinsky's compositional genius, even if 
    some of us who flatter ourselves that we are neither entirely foolish nor 
    entirely tone-deaf may harbour doubts about some of those works where the 
    composer fell most deeply into the quicksands of neo-classicism ( 
    Orpheus and Apollo, for example). Yet his æsthetic influence, 
    or at least the influence of the æsthetic propounded under Stravinsky's name 
    - the Poetics of Music in the Form of Six Lessons is far from 
    exclusively his work - has been more questionable, not least the typically 
    polemical nonsense about music being unable to express anything other than 
    itself. Even his compositional legacy remains ambivalent: if Stravinsky, by 
    virtue of his very genius, could convincingly play with hollowed-out 
    tonality beyond its sell-by date, that does not absolve his camp followers 
    from the twin charges of tedium and populism: an odd pair, but 
    unquestionably combined in a great deal of minimalism. 
    
    So how would Sir Colin Davis fare in a work such as Symphony in Three 
    Movements, a work tipping its hat towards the symphonic form in which 
    Davis so often excels, yet which is better understood as anti-symphonic? 
    Very well, as it happens, reminding us that the conductor once led a good 
    number of performances of Stravinsky's music. For one so unfailingly alert 
    to the humanity of Mozart's music - an increasingly rare gift in an age of 
    unforgivably brutalised Mozart - Sir Colin rendered the first movement of 
    Stravinsky's work as mechanistic to a tee, those 'inspiring' wartime 
    news-reels coming to life before our mind's eyes. The LSO's precision came 
    as no surprise, given its accustomed excellence, but should still be noted, 
    not least the barbarism - in a positive sense! - of its brass section. 
    Occasionally, I felt that the tempo might have benefited from being a little 
    swifter, but clarity and general relentlessness by and large compensated. 
    The fantastical development of the harp-led second movement proved evocative 
    of the ballet: Stravinsky's Scènes de ballet and Jeu de cartes 
    came to mind. The LSO's woodwind section seized its opportunity to shine, 
    with delightful interventions from the strings. The darker, more sinister 
    moments were equally well painted. (And this, whatever Stravinsky's 
    anti-Romantic declarations, is surely 'programme' music as well as 
    its supposedly 'absolute' antithesis.) The final movement was mercilessly 
    triumphant in its dehumanised and dehumanising glory, if anything more so at 
    a slightly more measured tempo than we generally hear. Heft and attack were 
    impeccable, as were the more soloistic moments: there was some superb 
    bassoon playing in particular. In Davis's hands, rhythms both harked back to 
    the Rite - of which, once again, he used to be a noted exponent - 
    whilst the fugue also looked forward to works such as Agon and even
    Movements, for all their difference in musical language. Is it yet 
    too late to hope that we might hope for some late Stravinsky from Sir Colin? 
    (Or indeed from anyone else, for it is music that is scandalously neglected, 
    whether by conductors or concert promoters…)
    
    For all the continued excellence of the LSO's performance, with some 
    gorgeous orchestral detail revealed, the Four Last Songs that 
    followed were best forgotten, the worst account I have heard. Sally Matthews 
    was a late substitution for Elza van den Heever. Matthews's small voice is 
    simply not up to the task, nor is her strange - merging into indistinct - 
    German diction: when one could hear the words, they sounded closer to Dutch. 
    To begin with, I wondered whether some fault lay as much with the conductor: 
    Strauss has not formed a major part of Sir Colin's repertoire, though he has 
    brought magic to Ariadne auf Naxos, both at Covent Garden and on 
    DVD from Dresden. The beat was laboured in Frühling, and 
    September was very slow indeed, distended even, its bar lines again far 
    too evident. Yet, in the latter, it sounded very much as though the slowness 
    was that of the soloist (and I love slow tempi when they work: think of 
    Janowitz and Karajan…). Matthews, however, was merely making a meal out of 
    it, audibly taking breaths within phrases. And yet, there was stillness at 
    the end, in preparation for that horn solo, heart-rendingly 
    delivered by David Pyatt: a true sense of an old man's farewell. Beim 
    Schlafengehen again brought orchestral revelations, not least from 
    inner parts, violas in particular. Yet it sounded less like 'going to sleep' 
    than long since turned comatose. Upon Matthews's entry, the music slowed, 
    the introduction having been relatively swift; throughout, the vocal line 
    was effortful. Gordan Nikolitch's violin solo was, as expected, exquisite, 
    with a beautiful touch of portamento. Strings were rich for that 
    final orchestral hurrah, the introduction to Im Abendrot. The rest, 
    you will be able to write for yourselves by now… 
    
    The day was saved by an excellent account of Beethoven's Pastoral 
    Symphony. After the laboured Strauss, a perky first movement - never, be it 
    noted, driven - came as quite the antidote. The LSO sounded wonderfully 
    cultivated: everything well articulated, without exaggeration. Perhaps there 
    was something slightly neutral to the first movement performance, but the 
    occasional doubt disappeared in a beautifully shaped, which is to say 
    'natural'-sounding, 'Scene by the Brook', which flowed more quickly 
    than one might have expected. Articulation was again exemplary, especially 
    woodwind phrasing. Davis imparted a splendid sense of building momentum, 
    from which one could happily enjoy the rest of the aural view, grainy 
    bassoons and magically pure flute and clarinet solos included. In a less 
    than excellent performance of this movement, I have been known to tire: no 
    such chance here. The third movement emerged as a true scherzo, alternately 
    light-footed and vigorous, the woodwind again superlative. Its trio was 
    rustic without the slightest hint of crudity; this was very much a dance, 
    joyful rather than driven. The transition to the fourth movement was 
    seamless, full of uneasiness, foreboding, whilst the storm clearly presaged 
    Berlioz. The LSO was as magnificent as in Sir Colin's performances of 
    Les Troyens, rhythmic attack and colour equally crucial. The finale 
    brought that serene nobility which might be considered Beethoven's - and 
    Davis's - stock-in-trade, but which one should never take for granted. 
    Earlier virtues of articulation and colour (woodwind and horns) were very 
    much present, as was true, unforced exultancy.
    
    Mark Berry 
  
