Other Links
Editorial Board
- 
            Editor - Bill Kenny 
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
              SEEN 
              AND HEARD CONCERT  REVIEW
 
Brahms, Beethoven and Elgar: Rafal Zambezycki–Payne (violin), Thomas Carroll (cello), Anthony Hewitt (piano), Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, Dirk Joeres, Cadogan Hall, London, 26.11.2008 (BBr)
            
            Brahms: 
            
            Academic Festival Overture, op.80 (1880) 
            Beethoven: Triple Concerto in C, op.56 (1804/1806) 
            
            Elgar: Variations on an Original Theme, Enigma, op.36 (1899)
            
            
            The Academic Festival Overture was a most welcome start to 
            this show. This is so much more than a mere pot–pourri of student 
            songs which we are so often told it is. I have often written that an 
            overture preceding the Concerto is the best way to settle us into 
            the music before entering the drama of the concerted work but 
            tonight this was more than an introduction, it provided all the 
            excitement we needed to get things going for the Beethoven Triple 
            Concerto is not one of his most stirring pieces and lacks the 
            edge which fill his other, later, concertos. The, very good, notes 
            in the programme suggested that because the piano part does not have 
            the virtuoso writing to be found in the piano concertos, whereas the 
            string parts are far ranging and difficult, and, certainly, this is 
            one reason for the relative neglect of the work. However, although 
            the imbalance is odd, there are other factors at work concerning the 
            neglect of the work – the most important being that the material is 
            fairly undistinguished. That’s a sweeping statement, Bob, I hear you 
            saying, and you’d be right, but the themes are not Beethoven’s best 
            and there are pages where one feels he’s simply going through the 
            motions and writing on auto–pilot. I have never felt that Beethoven 
            was happy having to accommodate three soloists and the feeling of 
            tension and struggle, which is the life blood of the concerto form, 
            is entirely lacking in this work. The three young soloists, who all 
            studied at the Menuhin School, did their best, Carroll was 
            especially impressive, employing a huge rich romantic tone, which 
            seemed inappropriate to the style of the work, and Hewitt did what 
            he could with a thankless part. 
            Zambezycki–Payne 
            was given the most grateful part and he made the most of his 
            opportunities to shine. The orchestra, which was so forceful and 
            grand in the Brahms, made little contribution here for the 
            accompaniment is sparse and uninteresting. There’s little you can do 
            with this work except play it and move on. I last heard this work 
            forty years ago when Boult conducted the Hallé and the Tortelier 
            family. It failed to impress me then and it didn’t impress me 
            tonight. Might I make a suggestion that not all the works of the 
            great masters are worth public revival and this work might be best 
            left to CD and private listening at home for nowhere is there 
            sufficient interest in this work to merit its inclusion in a 
            concert. I apologise to those who have a soft spot for this work but 
            I write what I feel and you now know my feelings towards this work.
            
            Any performance of Elgar’s great Enigma Variations must stand 
            or fall by its interpretation of Nimrod, which is something 
            of a national treasure, and therefore it must not be tampered with – 
            remember Bernstein and John Wilbraham when the former conducted the 
            work with the BBC Symphony? Tonight Joeres gave a towering 
            performance, not only of Nimrod, but of the whole work. This 
            was splendid stuff indeed and what really made this an exceptional 
            performance was the attention to even the smallest detail – the cool 
            flutes in Dorabella, the lower brass resplendent in Troyte, 
            the violas in Ysobel, and, best of all, the magnificent sound 
            made by timpanist Matt Perry in (***) which caused a bit of a 
            stir in the audience who couldn’t work out what the sound was! This 
            was perfectly placed. But the emotional core of the work was 
            Nimrod which was magnificent in its simplicity and left the 
            audience in awed silence, unable, even, to clear their throats or 
            make any kind of noise at the end.
            
            The Brahms and Elgar contained some of the best orchestral playing 
            I’ve heard all year; the RPO just gets better and better and it is 
            to be applauded in its efforts in matching such great music to 
            performances of equal stature.
            
            Bob Briggs 
            
            
	
	
			
	
	
              
	
	
              
              
              Back 
              to Top                                                 
                
              Cumulative Index Page 
                           
                                                                                                    
                                    
                          
