Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
              SEEN 
              AND HEARD BBC PROMENADE CONCERT  REVIEW
               
            
            Prom 72, Mozart and Shostakovich:
            
            
             Murray Perahia (piano); Chicago Symphony Orchestra/Bernard Haitink. 
            Royal Albert Hall, 9.9.2008 (CC)
            
            
            What an opportunity! The Chicago Symphony is one of the World’s 
            greatest orchestras; Murray Perahia is one of the World’s most 
            adored pianists; Bernard Haitink’s Shostakovich enjoys a tremendous 
            reputation. To hear them all together in one evening must surely 
            make this a prime candidate for my Prom of the year (this was my 
            final Prom this season.)
            
            More of Prom of the Year later:
            
             first, 
            Perahia’s Mozart. Of course, Perahia’s reputation preceeds him in 
            the form of his recorded legacy, in which he directed the complete 
            cycle of concertos from the keyboard. The concerto in question this 
            time was the 24th (C minor, K491, written in 1786), one of the 
            composer’s most grimly determined works, yet one that also allows in 
            occasional moments of light. Haitink and his Chicagoans set up the 
            minorish tension right from the beginning; but textures at forte 
            felt blunted. Perahia, on entrance, was more assertive than I for 
            one had expected, before his characteristically clean-cut intimacy 
            kicked in. Spurts of quasi-Beethovenian  virtuosity and fire hinted 
            at the contents of (Perahia’s own) cadenza, which was itself 
            surprisingly harmonically rich.
            
            A mistake on the part of the RAH’s ushers meant that scores of 
            people were let in to find their seats in between the first and 
            second movements, leaving audience members disturbed as the 
            Larghetto began. A shame. The movement itself was a flowing 
            Larghetto, almost an Andante, shot through with clean, tasteful 
            ornamentation from Perahia. Taste seems to be this pianist’s 
            watchword, as the finale almost seemed expressly written for 
            Perahia’s well-formed, well-toned staccato touch. Orchestrally, the 
            wind-band led variation was particularly noteworthy. Good to see 
            Perahia again after his long absence, and good to see hinm in such 
            exalted company.
            
            The CSO has just issued a performance of Shostakovich Fourth 
            Symphony on its CSO Re-Sound label (CSOR 901 814). That is a 
            superbly recorded disc, yet, in comparison with the present 
            performance, it sounds a little blunted. There was a raw force to 
            the opening of the symphony at the RAH that just does not transfer 
            well enough to disc. This is, after all, a symphony of huge 
            extremes, extremes that sounded even more visceral in Gergiev’s 2006
            
            Barbican performance with the LSO. Haitink allowed moments of 
            unashamed, sugary romance to sit next to outbursts that verged on 
            the cacophanous, it is true, and it is difficult to imagine a finer 
            account of the first movement fugue. And yet that movement’s main 
            climax could have had that little bit more frisson before the music 
            implodes. 
            
            The first movement missed by a whisker’s-breadth because of lack of 
            frisson; the second missed because it requires just the little bit 
            more edge than the Chicagoans were willing to give, especially the 
            strings. The finale impressed because of the brass chorales (the 
            Chicago brass is one of the World’s great sections); Haitink, 
            meanwhile, revealed himself at his most probing as he seemed to seek 
            to point out connections between the Fourth and Stravinsky (the 
            Stravinsky of Petrushka) and Mahler (Second Symphony in 
            particular). The celesta-tinged end of the symphony held its fair 
            share of magic, but there was not quite the feeling of reaching the 
            end of a shattering journey that can accompany this symphony’s 
            conclusion.
            
            
            Orchestral solo contributions were uniformly superlative, but a 
            special mention should perhaps go to the bassoon and cor anglais 
            players.
            
            And so to the Prom that will linger most in my memory from the 2008 
            season. Not the NYPO, not the Boulez/Janáček (although that held 
            magnificent moments), certainly not Lang Lang in recital ... 
            no, that title goes to the performance of the true masterwork that 
            is 
            
            Saint François d’Assise. 
            Olivier Messiaen’s opera is a work of genius, and my gratitude to 
            the Proms planners is beyond words for this opportunity to 
            experience the work complete. Sure, there was the odd corner or two 
            that could have been tidier, but if asked for one musical memory of 
            this summer, this would be it.
            
            
            Colin Clarke
