Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD SYMPOSIUM REPORT
KLANG Stockhausen Symposium -
Serialism:
Purcell Room,London 8.11.2008 (CR)
This
symposium formed part of the South Bank Centre’s Klang festival,
which was originally intended to celebrate Stockhausen’s 80th
birthday, but has instead become a fitting tribute to the
forward-thinking composer who died last year.
Education events such as this at the South Bank Centre are
well handled, and seek to discuss important questions about the
relevant composer and his/her works. This was no exception, and the
debate was both lively and engaging, appealing to academics and
interested members of the public in equal measure.
The afternoon began with a 45 minute lecture from musicologist
Richard Toop from the Sydney Conservatorium, who was, for a while,
an assistant to Stockhausen. Toop’s publications include writings on
Stockhausen, Ferneyhough, Ligeti and other leading twentieth century
composers, and he spoke knowledgably and passionately about the use
of serialism in Stockhausen’s work. Serialism was defined as
formulating and manipulating numeric patterns across different
musical parameters (pitch, rhythm, duration, register, timbre,
texture and so on), and was explained as a distinctly different
concept to twelve-tone music, which deals only with serial treatment
of pitch. Toop pointed out that throughout his lifetime,
Stockhausen followed his own course of exploration in music, using
serial techniques to create a vast variety of musical ideas, which
redefined what audiences may subsequently expect to hear. Mention
was made of Stockhausen’s own writings on his work, in the journal
Die Reihe which was set us as a ‘shop window for the European
Avante Garde’, with a scientific bias towards explaining the works
of Stockhausen and his contemporaries. It became clear that
Stockhausen’s aim was to create a template for a future possible
musical evolution, and he was aware of the importance of giving an
account of what he did and why. His quest for unity in his music was
fused with a drive to create, and deliver, a conceptual ideology.
This was a fascinating talk, which gave examples in Stockhausen’s
output of where the serial techniques employed were clearly audible
and where they were more hidden, and went some way towards
explaining Stockhausen’s compositional ethos.
The second talk of the afternoon came from Morag Grant, a music
sociologist who is now based in Germany. Grant’s spoken manner was
appealing, delivering an amusing and informative lecture which
sought to define serialism through the music of Stockhausen. Grant
focused on the impact of the music from a sonic point of view, and
used four words to sum this up: tension, energy, elemental and
beauty. The tension comes from a range of integrated material
that juxtaposes in a way which one would perhaps not otherwise
encounter than in serial music (for example, extremes of dynamic or
register within the space of two short notes). This element of
surprise creates a tension of its own, even when the music is well
known to the listener. To explain the concept of energy,
Grant likened serial composition as the splitting of a tone with the
splitting of an atom, and the energy created as a result of that
process. Combined with the youth, talent and ideological convictions
of Stockhausen and his contemporaries, the music is fuelled with
energy of its own. Elemental refers to the individual
components of the music and how they work together. Stockhausen
wrote about the importance of creating a scale of steps and using
every degree of that scale, since missing any out would amount to
modality. Grant drew strong parallels with architecture and art,
particularly the modular style of La Corbusier and the work of Paul
Klee, and explained how music and the other arts influenced each
other. The final descriptor, beauty, is not a word ordinarily
associated with serialism, as there seems to be a tendency to focus
on the compositional techniques rather than the sound of the music,
but Stockhausen’s music, is, in part, deeply beautiful, both in new
and traditional ways.
The session ended with a panel discussion, chaired by Gillian Moore,
Head of Contemporary Culture at the South Bank Centre and the person
responsible for putting the Klang Festival together. Moore was
joined by Toop, Grant and Stockhausen expert Robin Maconie. The
group discussed a range of topics, such as the use of serialism in
Klang (a set of 24 pieces), the concept of beauty in Stockhausen’s
music and the long term future of Stockhausen’s music. It was clear
that the audience included several well-respected Stockhausen
academics, and a lively and engaging discussion ensued.
Once again, this was an excellent event which helped to provide
background knowledge to Stockhausen’s music, without attempting to
dumb down or patronise. Long may the South Bank Centre’s commitment
to the exploration of contemporary culture continue!
Carla Rees
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page