Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
              SEEN 
              AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW
               
            
            Haydn, Mozart and Dvořák:
            
            
            Alfred Brendel (piano), Philharmonia Orchestra: Sir Charles 
            Mackerras, Royal Festival Hall, London 12.10.2008 (GD)
            
            
            
            Haydn: 
            
            Symphony No. 104 in D, ‘London”
            
            
            Mozart: 
            
            Piano Concerto No. 9 in E flat, K 271
            
            
            Dvořák: 
            
            Symphony No. 8 in G, op 88
            
            
            
            
            It is surprising how little Haydn Sir Charles has recorded for he is 
            a very distinctive Haydn conductor, but apart from about six Haydn 
            symphonies recorded with the New York based ‘Orchestra of St. Luke’s 
            in the early 90’s there seems to be little else. One would have 
            expected at least a complete set of the Salomon ‘London’ symphonies 
            from such a distinguished Haydn interpreter. Tonight one was 
            immediately in no doubt of these credentials with the direct and 
            darkly resplendent D minor opening of the ‘London’ symphony – with 
            period timpani and trumpets interpolated into the quite large 
            Philharmonia string compliment which cut through the textures in 
            tutti passages. Throughout, Mackerras was fully attendant to every 
            nuance of phrasing and contrast between lyrical reflection, 
            Austrian/Croation folk dance inflections and the baroque splendour 
            of the more dyanamic/ceremonial music, with a directness and spring 
            in the rhythmic structure which sounded totally idiomatic. There was 
            one oddity: after the ‘Andante’ opening there was an unusually long 
            pause before the few woodwind bars which lead to the contrasting D 
            minor tutti sequence. I checked the same passage in Mackerras’s St 
            Luke’s recording and the transition there is perfectly coordinated 
            with tempo already established with no pause; I can only assume that 
            this was some kind of momentary lapse in concentration. However, 
            this was a fine interpretation of Haydn’s last published symphony, 
            even if it lacked, in the final analysis, the accuracy (particularly 
            in string articulation) and overall classical coherence of Sir 
            Charles’s St Luke’s recording.  
             
            This was very much Brendel’s evening, being his very last UK concert 
            performance and after the concerto, and his encore, he received a 
            standing ovation. In 1999 and the early 2000s Brendel and Mackerras, 
            with the Scottish Chamber Orchestra, initiated, what appeared to be, 
            a cycle of the Mozart Piano Concertos, but that project was suddenly 
            cut short after a few issues with, as far as I know, no explanation. 
            It appears that strict market forces, such as we are witnessing at 
            the moment, have no regard for social or cultural improvement, let 
            alone artistic/musical merit or achievement! 
            
            Whilst fully appreciating the sense of ‘special occasion’ here – in 
            some ways the end of an era, in terms of a tradition of classical 
            piano playing – Brendel’s performance lacked a certain distinction; 
            a classical sensibility in Mozart which is certainly evident in 
            Brendel’s past Mozart concert performances and recordings. Of 
            course, this was partly to do with the inevitable reduction 
            of nimble, elegant, finger work which, unfortunately, comes with 
            age. Throughout one was aware of a deep musicality, but a certain 
            forcefulness, more suited to Beethoven, crept in the performance 
            especially in Brendel’s elaborated trills. The cadenzas also sounded 
            strangely stilted and even prosaic. Brendel was happier in the final 
            rondo with its wonderfully incorporated ‘Menuetto’ sequence, which 
            sounded fresher and spontaneously crisp. Mackerras is a wonderful 
            concerto accompanist, especially in Mozart and the beautifully 
            poignant ‘Andantino’ was delivered with rare subtlety, grace and 
            luminous pathos, but in the outer movements, fine as they were, I 
            didn’t quite experience the spring, contrast and alacrity which 
            characterised his earlier performances and recordings with Brendel 
            and the SCO. Most surprising was that Mackerras did not use 
            antiphonal violins as he had done in the Haydn symphony.  
            
            As an encore Brendel gave a most moving performance of the Busoni 
            arrangement of Bach’s Chorale ‘Nun komm der Heiden Heiland’ BWV 659; 
            not, incidentally, the ‘Andante’ second movement from the ‘Italian 
            Concerto’ as one reviewer claimed! Here the gravity of the slow 
            marching low octaves seemed to resonate throughout the whole hall. A 
            real occasion! 
            
            The Dvořák 
            Eighth Symphony was a delight from beginning to end. I have heard 
            many performances and recordings of this popular Symphony, but not 
            many as compelling as was heard tonight. Mackerras has the rare 
            ability to make this Symphony sound enormously enjoyable without 
            turning it into a virtuoso orchestral showpiece, as so often 
            happens, and he never lost sight of the work as a Symphony. From the 
            flowing melodies of the opening ‘Allegro con brio’, with a perfectly 
            timed G minor develolment section and rousing coda, through the 
            flowing lyrical andante, the graceful waltz of the third movement 
            and the festive finale in rondo/variation form, Mackerras 
            articulated every rhythmic nuance and lyrical contrast with 
            consummate mastery. He never let a particular detail stem the 
            contour and flow of the whole. Of especial excellence was the way in 
            which Mackerras made the magical transition to the minor in the 
            second movement, initiated by a chromatic figure in the horn, 
            without ever making the passage appear underlined or melodramatic. 
            Mackerras also toned down the more overt “circus” elements in the 
            finale without ever losing sight of the festive delights the music 
            arouses. There was the occasional woodwind fluff, especially in the 
            finale, but this in no way detracted from the overall excellence and 
            inspiration of the Philharmonia’s playing. Mackerras correctly used 
            antiphonal violins with six double basses placed in a row at the 
            back of the orchestra. Certainly a real occasion, not only for 
            Alfred Brendel, but also for Sir Charles Mackerras and the 
            Philharmonia.  
             
            Geoff Diggines 
