Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
              SEEN 
              AND HEARD OPERA REVIEW
               
            
            Rossini, The Barber of Seville: 
            Soloists, 
            Chorus and Orchestra of English National Opera. Conductor: Rory 
            Macdonald. The London Coliseum, London. 22.9.2008 (JPr) 
             
             
             
            Sir Jonathan Miller and English National Opera have been a 
            successful partnership since 1978 and his stagings of Rigoletto 
            and The Mikado have been two of the company’s greatest 
            successes over these past 30 years. This 
            is the tenth revival of his 1987  Barber  and no doubt ENO 
            will be 
            hoping for  similar longevity from his new staging of La bohème
            to be seen early next year.
            
 
            
            John Tessier (Almaviva) Andrew Shore (Bartolo) 
            and Garry Magee (Figaro)
 
            
            
            
            With its controversial origins, who would 
            have believed that when 
            it was first performed in 
            1816,  The Barber of Seville  would become one of the 
            most loved operas of all time ? Why 
            controversial? Well,  firstly it was 
            far from original. Beaumarchais' famous 
            play written in 1772 had already attracted 
            another composer, Giovanni Paisiello and his operatic version (1782) 
            was a great hit. (This is
            very
            similar to what happened  with the Phantom of the Opera story 
            for which there were 
            other now-forgotten attempts at musical versions 
            of it before it brought Lloyd Webber 
             
            his great success.) When Paisiello's 
            admirers heard about Rossini's new work they caused a commotion at 
            its première - the opening  performance did not go well and 
            things looked fairly 
            bleak for Rossini afterwards.  In 
            the end however,  his version soon surpassed Paisiello's 
            in popular appeal throughout Europe, with performances from London 
            to St Petersburg. In 1825 it was the first opera to be sung in 
            Italian in New York, and Rossini was arguably the most popular 
            composer in the world at the time.
            
            As it happens, The Barber 
            of Seville can now feel like quite a modern 
            idea because today's cinema and television 
            audiences are more used to the idea of 
            ‘prequels’ than people in the early  nineteenth century 
            would have been. Beaumarchais' 
            original play had been followed by The Marriage of Figaro 
            in 1778 which resulted 
            of course in Mozart's wonderful opera 
            eight years later, featuring the continuing story of Rossini's 
            Barber  characters .
            
            Beaumarchais’ original drama was rather old-fashioned even in its 
            own time however, because his characters 
            have their roots in the  commedia 
            dell’arte tradition dating back to 
            sixteenth-century Italy and still popular in much 
            of Europe two 
            hundred years later. Figaro, Count Almaviva in his soldier 
            disguise and Doctor Bartolo reflect the ‘stock’ characters of the 
            cunning servant, the braggart soldier and the
            duped, doddery old man.
            The opera also has the hoariest of plots
            in which a pair of young lovers is united 
            after overcoming a number of obstacles.
            
            Both for his contemporary audience, and for Rossini’s later success, 
            Beaumarchais filled out the characters to make them very 
            recognisably human and added
            a subversive socio-political 
            theme:  when the young Count goes to 
            Seville to pursue his heart’s desire, he not only leaves the Madrid 
            court and his family but also turns his back on a 
            proposed  marriage arranged for him. 
            He woos his beloved Rosina, in 
            disguise to be sure that she accepts him 
            for himself and not his wealth or title. The 
            play affirms that in matters of love,  we 
            are all equal and that true feelings - not 
            money or property -  are the best 
            basis for marriage. In a small way,  Beaumarchais 
            gave some voice to the rising revolutionary zeal of the 1780s which would 
            soon overwhelm a decaying aristocracy and 
            herald the Age of Enlightenment, the Romantic era and the rise of 
            democracy.
            
            
            
            Anna 
            Grevelius 
            (Rosina) and John Tessier (Almaviva)
            
            
            
            It is in fact 21 years ago since I saw 
            this production myself for the first and only time with the original 
            cast, including Alan Opie as Figaro and intriguingly
            with Jane Eaglen as Berta. Although 
            Jonathan Miller was in the audience this time,
            the revival was directed by
            
            Ian 
            Rutherford. The dusty, slightly claustrophobic, ‘inside 
            of the house’ set where Rosina seems imprisoned has aged well – even 
            though it sounds a little arthritic when moved - and 
            it 
            continues to provide a restricted platform for the
            plot's farcical events.
            
            There are  lots of sight gags; the ladder emerging from the trunk 
            brought on stage at the start by the Count’s performing troupe, 
            and the ducking and diving caused by Don Basilio’s large hat are 
            just two examples. The humour is anarchic, anti-authoritarian, a 
            little sardonic but rarely cruel. Pomposity may be deflated and 
            no-one suffers long-term harm as The Marriage of Figaro 
            shows. It is Rosina perhaps  who 
            comes off worst but at the end of The Barber of Seville 
            she is yet to know that her marriage to 
            the Count will be a loveless one. Miller wraps up commedia 
            dell’arte, the Marx Brothers and the Whitehall Farce tradition to 
            give the audience an evening of unalloyed pleasure, insight and 
            subtlety of characterisation, extraordinary wit and good humour, as 
            well as huge amounts of humanity.
            
            For me at least,  the surtitles for 
            the opera in English proved unnecessary as the 
            balance between stage and orchestra, and 
            the fine ensemble cast that ENO have recruited
            allowed all of Amanda and 
            Anthony Holden's translation to be heard 
            clearly. This varied from rhyming couplets such as ‘It’s time to 
            take a sounding / Ah, 
            how my heart is pounding’ to expositions 
            such as ‘Figaro has booked a lawyer to marry off his niece’ and 
            Doctor Bartolo’s response ‘He hasn’t got a niece’ 
            -
            which drew an 
            ‘Ahh!’ from the audience to show how much they were wrapped up in  the story. 
            
            With his rich voice, excellent diction and wonderful comic turn, 
            Andrew Shore’s Bartolo is at the very heart of the performance. It 
            is amazing to think that this most versatile singer was last month 
            singing Alberich at Bayreuth. His fussy physical humour and pained 
            expression of piqued pomposity reminded me 
            of Arthur Lowe in Dad’s Army. He imposed himself on
            everything around him and 
            all eyes were 
            attracted to him whenever he was on stage.
            
            Yet with a revival cast of such surprising depth,
             Shore never seemed to unbalance the ensemble. 
            
            Making a notable British debut was the Canadian John Tessier, a 
            tenor who fearlessly attacked this high-lying role with much ease 
            and lyrical charm; the occasional moments 
            of strain in his top notes I put down to first night nerves. His 
            English suffers a little from a transatlantic drawl but he acted 
            well in his various guises and disguises. He reminds me very much of 
            another John, John Brecknock, an ENO stalwart of these type of roles 
            who sang the Count in the early 1980s.
            
            The young conductor Rory Macdonald, a former Covent Garden Young 
            Artist working with ENO for the first time, delivers an account of 
            the score that is brimming with youthful energy, well-judged tempi 
            and not a little fizz and verve.
            
            For all of its 192 years, 
            this staple of the operatic repertory complete 
            with the tongue-twisting Largo al 
            factotum and its
            repeated
            'Figaros' is 
            something that rarely disappoints. Here it 
            remains as witty, as often laugh-out-loud 
            funny, as touching and 
            as tuneful as it ever was. 
            
            Jim Pritchard 
            
            
            
            Pictures © Alastair Muir
            
            
	
	
			
	
	
              
              
              Back 
              to Top                                                 
                
              Cumulative Index Page 
                           
                                                                                                    
                                    
                          
