Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
              SEEN 
              AND HEARD CONCERT REVIEW 
              
              
              Turnage,
              
              
              Henze,
              
              
              Brahms 
              and 
              
              Tchaikovsky: 
              Christian Tetzlaff (violin)   London Philharmonic Orchestra. 
              Vladimir Jurowski (conductor), Royal Festival Hall, 2.2. 2008 (GD)
               
              
              
              
              Mark-Anthony Turnage: Lullaby for Hans (London Premiere)
              Hans Werner Henze: Second Sonata per archi
              Brahms: Violin Concerto in D
              Tchaikovsky: Symphony No 6 in B minor (Pathetique)
              
              
              Jurowski has received much critical acclaim in his recent 
              appointment as Principal conductor of the LPO. The LPO’s publicity 
              machine has even been comparing this recent partnership with the 
              vintage years when Beecham (the orchestra’s founder) was at the 
              helm. And as I said in a recent review of the LPO under Adam 
              Fischer, the orchestra in its present form is indeed capable of 
              some superb playing. This concert opened with the premiere of a 
              short but well crafted string composition by Mark-Anthony Turnage, 
              who is currently receiving a round of performances from conductor 
              and orchestra as the LPO’s Composer in Residence. Lullaby for 
              Hans was written to commemorate Henze’s 80th 
              birthday. Henze has been  a friend and mentor throughout Turnage's 
              career and this short, rather lilting piece for strings was 
              re-worked and extended from a short piano-piece. The lullaby mood 
              of the piece is interrupted by two brief passages of faster, more 
              agitated music : the coda however subsides into a mood of calm 
              resolution. For the two main works Jurowski wisely used antiphonal 
              placing of violins; more unusually he placed the violas to his 
              left, behind the first violins, and celli to his right, behind the 
              second violins. Double basses were raised on the right. But as far 
              as orchestral balance was concerned the results were  convincing.
              
              The opening work was well complimented by the Henze Second 
              Sonata for Strings. This beautifully composed and contrasted 
              piece dates from 1993 and is in three movements lasting just under 
              ten minutes. It was inspired by the strings of the Leipzig 
              Gewandhaus Orchestra. I heard shades of Hindemith, Stravinsky, 
              even Alban Berg but  the piece had an an economic elegance 
              all it’s own. Jurowski and the orchestra played these two 
              contrasted and related string pieces with great subtlety and 
              dynamic/lyrical finesse. Especially notable, in the Henze work, 
              were some excellently phrased contributions from solo violin and 
              cello. I am not sure that the two opening contemporary pieces 
              worked very well as a prelude to two standard works from the 
              classical repertory. Their style and tone would have contrasted 
              better in a complete contemporary programme. But organisers are 
              still reluctant to programme all contemporary concerts for fear of 
              half empty halls.
              
              Christian Tetzlaff sounded a tad harsh in his opening statement in 
              the Brahms Violin Concerto. He seemed to be trying to 
              emulate a tonal  grandeur which did not quite come off,  too 
              often sounding forced rather than noble.  This was not helped by 
              Jurowski’s very close attention to specific orchestral details in 
              the opening tutti, at the expense of  maintaining an overall line 
              contrasting the lyrical with the dramatic. The whole of the first 
              movement simply failed to hang together, the problem being 
              exacerbated by a rather ponderous initial tempo choice. (The 
              actual tempo marking is ‘Allegro non troppo’). I certainly missed 
              the suberb lyrical flow and contrast here of a Milstein or 
              Oistrakh and the assured structural coherence of a Klemperer or a 
              Monteux.
              
              Despite a beautifully phrased opening oboe solo,  the problem 
              of musical balance between soloist and orchestra persisted in the 
              F major ‘Adagio’.  Tetzlaff’s rather edgy, even strident tone, 
              contrasting in the wrong way with the quite hushed quality 
              Jurowski achieved especially in the cantabile orchestral string 
              line. Just a  bar into the finale and Tetzlaff broke a string. He 
              was a good couple of minutes restringing. After this initial lapse 
              the finale sounded a shade overheated and orchestrally rather 
              scrambled,  particularly at the beginning of the coda. The 
              subtle dynamic gradations on timpani just before the coda were not 
              sufficiently rhythmically pointed as they should be. Tetzlaff 
              played Joachim’s classic cadenza in the first movement. After the 
              Brahms,  Tetzlaff played as an encore a pleasingly flexible 
              and fluid performance of the ‘Largo’ from Bach’s C major Sonata 
              for solo violin.
              
              I was anticipating Jurowski’s performance of Tchaikovsky’s last 
              symphony with some enthusiasm. How ‘Russian’ would his 
              ‘Pathetique’ sound? Jurowski is the son of Mikhail Jurowski and 
              received a musical training in Moscow. The Russian performances of 
              the ‘Pathetique’ I have heard on record from Mravinsky, Kondrashin, 
              Golovanov and Temirkanov, all with Russian orchestras, are all 
              very different interpretatively, but they all emphasise the almost 
              frenetic, dramatic power, and darkness of the music in a way not 
              often found in Western performances. From this perspective 
              Jurowski’s rendition was something of a disappointment,  
              being distinctively underpowered and not sufficiently dramatic. 
              However that having been said, this performance did have some 
              merits of its own, not least some fine playing from the LPO.
              
              The lugubrious opening which takes us from E minor to the home 
              tonic of B minor, was managed well with some eloquent bassoon 
              contributions. Jurowski phrased the initial Allegro on violas in a 
              curiously legato style; although the score clearly indicates that 
              the notes of each phrase should be detached. By the time we came 
              to the great D major string melody,  I felt a lack of line 
              and connection with the opening material, although Jurowski played 
              the melody in a relatively rubato-free style as indicated. 
              Although the dying-away theme on the clarinet was beautifully 
              phrased it didn’t sufficiently register the ppppp the 
              composer asks for as one of the most dramatic dynamic contrasts to 
              the ff crash which initiates the development section. The 
              vast contrasting vicissitudes of the development - including the 
              solemn brass chorale from the Russian Orthodox Mass of the Dead, 
              and the veritably ‘Wotan’ like huge descending scale with the 
              ffff timpani crescendo -  all sounded well 
              articulated/played, but all crucially lacked that almost 
              unbearable sense of universal tragedy that one hears in the 
              greatest performances. Also,  at the height of the drama when 
              the mood is intensified by ff trumpets, trombones and tuba  
              in dramatic canon,  the balance favoured the trombones over 
              the trumpets. But this might have been partially due to the 
              Festival Hall's rather restricted, opaque sounding acoustic.
              
              The ‘Allegro con grazia’ second movement ‘waltz’ was strangely 
              inelegant, completely lacking a sense of the ‘grazia’. Jurowski’s 
              phrasing here was peculiarly four-square. There was no sense of 
              the five-four time signature juxtaposing with the two-four and 
              three-four bar. The very Slavonic sounding trio with its ostinato 
              pedal-point on timpani simply failed to register; the timpani beat 
              and its carefully marked dynamic levels of gradation were barely 
              audible!
              
              The ‘gigantic march’ (Tovey) which constitutes the third movement,  
              started off quite well but later became occasionally rhythmically 
              slack especially in the swirling cross-rhythms between string and 
              woodwind , just before the march proper, and at the ‘sempre fff’ 
              close. For the main tutti march itself Jurowski speeded up 
              considerably where no acceleration of tempo is asked for. This 
              diminished the accumulative affect of the whole movement; the 
              march itself sounding rather rushed and underpowered.
              
              The final ‘Adagio lamentoso’ was played straight through in a 
              rather bland manner. The great hymn-like threnody of the finale’s 
              main theme had no sense of the solemn almost ghostly aspect one 
              encounters in Mravinksy’s classic rendition. The great surging 
              climax which ‘resolves’ itself in a closing lament in B minor, 
              again was well contoured and played,  but lacked that crucial 
              ambiguous sense of resolve mixed with catastrophe, which again  
              in a great performance,  takes on the status of a universal 
              (not just personal) catastrophic tragedy. Tchaikovsky’s subtle and 
              discreet incorporation of a single stroke on the gong initiating 
              the final lament; ‘the most ominous sound in the orchestra’ for 
              Tovey, sounded rather intrusive and indiscreet tonight. This was 
              was not helped by the unfortunate extra-musical intrusion of a 
              mobile ring-tone. What a moment to mix the banal with the sublime!
              
              
              
              
              Geoff Diggines
