Sibelius (1865-1957) - Symphony No. 7
does adversity transmute talent into greatness that we seem to consider
it a general rule. Sibelius would be an exception to prove that rule. While
still only 32, the Finnish government awarded him a pension for life, a
year before he even began work on his First Symphony. That he went
on to produce some of the Twentieth Century's finest and most original
music says much for his strength of character in the face of enforced prosperity.
Although his output was huge and varied, including much attractive lighter
music, it is the seven symphonies which are regarded as the pinnacle of
his art. His ideal was expressed in a reported conversation (1907) with
Mahler, who saw the symphony as “like the world - it must contain everything”,
while to Sibelius what mattered was “the profound logic creating a connection
between all the motifs”. Although diametrically opposed, these are complementary
rather than antithetical viewpoints, each containing elements of
however, didn't pursue his ideal with anything like ruthless single-mindedness.
Only in the Second, Third and Fifth do we trace a
progressive refinement of his technique for “seamless transition” from
one movement to the next. While composing the pastoral and euphonious Sixth,
Sibelius was planning the Seventh. In a letter to a friend (1918),
he made it clear that “profound logic” was far from top priority. The Seventh
would be “about joy of life and vitality, with appassionato passages, in
three movements, the last being a Hellenic rondo”. Maybe this was a Sibelian
smokescreen, because what emerged six years later was well wide of his
declared mark: in the Seventh, Sibelius integrated all the “components”
of a symphony into one seamless span, with all the motifs closely interconnected.
like with Schubert and his Eighth, something of a myth has grown
around Sibelius and his Seventh, a suggestion that the work was
so “perfect” that it couldn't be improved upon. Well, he did dabble
with an Eighth, so obviously he wasn't entirely convinced that the
was positively the end of the symphonic trail, nor must we forget the brooding
magnificence of Tapiola, the greatest of the several works realised
following the Seventh.
one describe this astonishing work? Starting from the dominant G, strings
climb through an octave and a half of the scale of C, the simplest of “melodic”
ideas that generates half a dozen thematic elements, some of which derive
from upward or downward cadences around the tonic . . . but, you don't
want to hear all this now, do you? Good, let's try another tack
the single movement falls into a broad ABABA+coda layout, as far as tempo
and mood are concerned. The [A] sections and the coda are typically slow,
while the [B] sections are scherzando episodes. The overall structure is
signposted by recurrences of a noble solo trombone theme. For the poetically-minded,
let's try an analogy: imagine going through wooded, mountainous terrain.
Sometimes you're amid gloomy forest, sometimes bubbling streams sparkle
in shafts of sunlight, sometimes you're gazing down into deep, verdant
valleys, or up at lofty, ice-capped peaks (trombone solo?). But, you're
not tearing around on a motorbike, so the scene changes only very gradually
from one awesome perspective to another - you can't tell just where one
ends and the next starts, but you sure as hell know when to whip out your
camera! Some describe the end as a “blaze of sound”, but it's more like
a fierce sunset, a dark red heat bisecting frosted hillsides. Whether viewed
as pure music, or as a “landscape”, there's a palpable feeling of integrity
and implacable logic: Sibelius' life's goal achieved, I reckon. So, perhaps
it's as well he did give up on his Eighth?
© Paul Serotsky
29, Carr Street,
for use apply. Details here
Copyright in these notes is retained by the author without whose prior written permission they may not be used, reproduced, or kept in any form of data storage system. Permission for use will generally be granted on application, free of charge subject to the conditions that (a) the author is duly credited, and (b) a donation is made to a charity of the author's choice.