Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Sir Michael Tippett (1905-1998) String Quartets Volume 1
String Quartet No. 1 in A major (1934-35, rev. 1943) [18:49]
String Quartet No. 2 in F sharp major (1941-1942) [19:55]
String Quartet No. 4 (1977-78) [25:53]
Tippett
Quartet (John Mills (violin); Jeremy Isaac (violin);
Maxine Moore (viola), Bozidar Vukotic (cello))
rec. St Silas the Martyr, Kentish Town, London, 12-14
November 2007. DDD NAXOS
8.570496 [64:37]
There
are only two recordings of the complete Michael Tippett
String Quartets currently available. The Lindsays concluded
their cycle in 1992, with the first three having been
recorded in 1975. For many years, apart from the odd
chamber concert or private hearing, their cycle has been
the only medium for exploring these seminal works. And
excellent they are too. However, all Tippett enthusiasts
will be delighted that the eponymous Quartet has been
selected by Naxos to make a new reading of these superb
pieces.
The
Tippett Quartet, which was formed a decade ago, has rapidly
become one of Britain’s leading string quartets. Their ‘mission
statement’ is to combine so-called mainstream repertoire
with contemporary works. They have recently made recordings
for Dutton Epoch of music by Cecilia McDowall and Stephen
Dodgson. These have been well received. Naturally, as
their name implies, they have a ‘soft spot’ for Tippett’s
music.
Since
hearing the first three Quartets way back in 1975, I
have agreed with commentators that these works are critical
to an understanding of Tippett. The Fourth and Fifth
Quartets chart the composer’s progress into a different
soundscape, but remain essential to an appreciation of
his career.
The
first volume of this Naxos release contrasts the first
two ‘lyrical’ Quartets with the much more dissonant Fourth,
which was written in 1977-78.
The
programme notes point out that Michael Tippett, as a
student, was ‘invincibly’ drawn to the quartet medium
after hearing performances in London by the Busch and
the Lener ensembles. He is known to have written a number
of unpublished quartets in the late 1920s. However it
was the Quartet in A major that was the first work in
the genre to be accepted as part of Tippett’s canon.
It appeared in its original form in 1935. In 1943 it
was revised, being reduced from four movements to three.
The composer had felt that the first two were unsuccessful.
He composed a new ‘allegro appassionato’, which clearly
reflects the composer’s admiration of Beethoven. The
slow movement is truly beautiful. It is ‘cast in the
form of an Elizabethan Pavane’ and Tippett describes
this music as being ‘almost unbroken lines of lyric song
for all the instruments in harmony’. The final movement
is an enthusiastic allegro which is really a fugue – although
without the pedantic overtones that such a form may suggest.
This fugue is perhaps more redolent of Beethoven than
J.S. Bach.
The
Second String Quartet builds on the success of the first
and once again owes much of its ethos to Beethoven. It
has been well described as being ‘lithe and dancing’.
Certainly lyricism is one of the hallmarks of this work.
One reviewer suggested that the key designation of F#
major should not put off atonalists from enjoying this
quartet. Contrariwise, those who enjoy traditional key
relationships should not assume that Tippett will oblige
them: certainly the work begins in F# minor and concludes
in the tonic major, as does the second movement fugue.
However, a better impression is gained if it is assumed
that Tippett has designed a work that hovers around the ‘noted’ key
rather than using it as a part of the work’s tonal structure. Yet
the composer himself states that this quartet is the
most classically balanced of the first three. At first
glance it would appear to be written in standard four-movement
form. However the composer insists that the “standard
is juggled with and moved around.”
This
work ought to rank as one of the finest examples of a
twentieth century string quartet. It seems unbelievable
that there are only two or three recordings of this currently
available. The Second Quartet was first performed in
1943.
The
first time I heard the Fourth Quartet, I admit that I
was not impressed. Its style seemed a million miles away
from the Tippett that I knew and loved. This included
the Double Concerto, the first two Quartets, the A Midsummer
Marriage and A Child of our Time. I realised
that there was a more complex and dissonant side to Tippett’s
art – having ploughed my way through a recording of the Vision
of St Augustine. I remember hearing the first performance
of the Fourth Symphony at the Royal Albert Hall and feeling
it was just not what I imagined or hoped what it would
be like. It was harder to come to terms with than the
blues-influenced Third Symphony. That was all a very
long time ago: music, like life, sorts itself out. What
was difficult listening for me in 1978 now seems quite
reasonable and even enjoyable. Moreover, the same can
be said of the Fourth Quartet. Listening to this work
for the first time in many years I was impressed by both
the sound-world and its formal balance. Tippett has written
many, to my mind, obscure and obtuse words about his
compositional ethos. Sometimes this can be of help, but
more often that not it is a hindrance to an appreciation
of the music. The programme notes point out that in this
present work Tippett was exploring “the compositional
potential of one-movement form, using it a metaphor for
the cycle of life.” Here, this life is a specifically
human one, and that of a certain individual. Over and
above this emotional programme, the composer was attempting
to attain the ‘purity and tenderness’ of Beethoven.
The
sleeve-notes gives quite a long analysis of this work – which
deserves study. However the key thing to note is that
there is much beauty in this work – in spite of the reputation
this work has for dissonance. And finally, the work is
really conceived as being in one movement – as opposed
to the earlier works. The Quartet has a number of sections,
which contrast tempi, and to a certain extent harmonic
language, but is played without a break. Finally the
listener will surely note that the third section is truly
lyrical: the music here is beautiful and lacks the acerbic
sound of earlier pages.
This
CD will appeal strongly to all interested in the chamber
music of Michael Tippett. The three works as performed
with great technical skill, articulation and sheer understanding
of the music. Naturally there is a hiatus in style between
the first two Quartets and the last. Yet the Tippett
Quartet are equally at home with the lyrical demands
of the earlier works as they are with the more complex,
dissonant and involved structures of the last. However,
if the listener needs a sample of the sheer perfection
of this recording, they only need to listen to the Lento
cantabile of the A major Quartet. This is surely
one of the most beautiful and moving pieces of music
in Tippett’s catalogue in particular and in English music
in general.
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.