The etudes of Chopin are one of the absolute 
                benchmarks of the pianist’s repertoire. As a series of miniatures 
                they are almost without parallel for their range of emotional 
                content, breadth of technical coverage and exploration of tonal 
                centres in the 19th century repertoire of keyboard 
                music. While most are really quite short pieces (this recording 
                ranging from the maximum of Op.25 no 19 at just over five minutes 
                down to the brevity of Op.25 no 21 at but a second over one minute) 
                they cover such a gamut of feeling, power and expression that 
                there is endless potential for the imaginative pianist to communicate 
                something new to the listener within the confines of these rigidly 
                fashioned masterpieces. The Op.10 set date from 1831 (published 
                in 1832) and are (apart from nos 7 and 8) arranged in pairs of 
                relative major/minor keys. Yet this structural unification does 
                nothing to hinder the wide range of ideas and textures that Chopin 
                explores. The set published in 1837 as Op.25 had a longer gestation 
                period from 1832 through to 1836 and culminate in the powerfully 
                expressive numbers 7, 11 and 12. In these Chopin brought to bear 
                his most perfected skills of technical writing. Joyce Hatto is 
                in complete control of all aspects of these demanding works. Her 
                technique is impeccable and her range of expression is admirable, 
                although it is arguable whether she could have encompassed a wider 
                dynamic range in these interpretations. This may not necessarily 
                be the fault of the performer however, for the recording has some 
                rather strange qualities. It is noted that the piano is a Steinway, 
                and Steinways are ideal for this repertoire, being neither muddy 
                in the bass nor tinny in the upper registers and capable of producing 
                the most crystalline bell-like sounds under the fingers of a master. 
                This writer has no doubt that Hatto is capable of producing that 
                quality of sound; there are flashes of it throughout Op.10 no.11, 
                and in the powerfully controlled articulation of Op.25 no.10 but 
                too often the recorded sound is too distant, lacking in body and 
                brittle. This latter aspect gives a quality of the extreme brightness 
                of a Yamaha piano to the sound and detracts from the inherent 
                velvety smoothness of the Steinway sound. The opening track, the 
                first of the Op.10 études, gives a major surprise in this 
                brittleness of recorded sound. Given the nature of the constant 
                arpeggio figures in the right hand, set against the mighty octaves 
                of the left hand theme, the necessity of capturing both the clarity 
                and the sonority is paramount and this recording does not really 
                achieve that. 
              
 
              
This is a pity for it is unarguable that Joyce 
                Hatto has much to say in these works. The brilliant Presto of 
                Op.25 no.2 is executed with flawless precision and a grace bordering 
                on Schumann’s description of Chopin’s own performance as "soft 
                as the song of a sleeping child" for, although that image 
                is hard to imagine in relation to the incredible speed, Hatto 
                here keeps the dynamic under strict control so that the rapid 
                passagework seems more to flutter than anything else. However, 
                once again the microphone placing gives a sound that seems distant 
                and curiously removed. This works better in a jerky work such 
                as Op.25 no.4, but generally it is not comfortable as a listening 
                experience. 
              
 
              
This is a brilliant performance with many aspects 
                of sheer technical magic displayed in elegant virtuosity and characterful 
                interpretations, but the disc is sadly let down by the hard and 
                colourless and strangely disengaged recording quality. On that 
                basis it is regrettably not easy to recommend. 
              
 
              
Peter Wells 
              
See also review 
                by Jonathan Woolf 
              
MusicWeb 
                can offer the complete 
                Concert Artist catalogue