• Searching Musicweb
  • Monthly index
  • Recordings of the Year
  • Label index
  • Masterwork index
  • Series index
  • Search engines
• Review Archive
  • Classical
  • Downloads
  • Jazz
  • Concerts
  • Nostalgia
  • Books
  • Film music
• Resources
  • Composer pages
  • National discographies
  • Online books
  • Arthur Butterworth's columns
  • Philip Scowcroft's British light music collection
  • Interviews
  • Programme notes
  • Other material
• Articles
• Seen & Heard
• Jazz reviews
• Message Board
• Announcements
• About Musicweb
  • About Musicweb
  • Contact Musicweb
  • Contributors
  • What they say about us
  • Visitor stats
• Site Map

BUY NOW 

Crotchet   AmazonUK   AmazonUS

Arthur Meulemans, undoubtedly the most significant Flemish composer of his generation, has the lion’s share here, and deservedly so. His huge output includes fifteen symphonies, operas, many orchestral works and several concertos as well as a lot of vocal and instrumental music. His five string quartets roughly span the whole of his long and prolific composing life. His first essay (Uit mijn Leven) dates from 1907 and the Fifth String Quartet was completed in 1953. The Second and Third String Quartets (1932 and 1933 respectively) are, to a certain extent, transitional works still embedded in the early Romantic tradition but already clearly influenced by Impressionism. Both share a number of features, stylistically and formally. Both are conceived as suites of character pieces rather than as intricately worked-out compositions. There is little thematic relationship, if any, between the movements. Moreover, both are fairly light-hearted pieces of great melodic charm rather than big pieces of great depth and complexity. Both are engaging works, superbly crafted, richly melodic and beautifully written for the strings.

The Piano Quintet of 1946 (and not 1916 as I erroneously mentioned in my composer’s profile some time ago) retains most qualities of the earlier works. It too is in the nature of a colourful divertimento with a beautifully lyrical slow movement. Again it does not set out to plumb any great depth but it is a quite attractive work in its own right.

Arthur’s younger brother Herman followed his brother’s steps in many ways. He too studied at the Lemmens Institute and later succeeded his brother as head of the Organ School in Hasselt. He also composed a considerable amount of music which is largely neglected at the time of writing. The piano pieces recorded her (we are not told when they were composed) show him as a miniaturist writing salon music of quality, but light in tone and contend. When listening to these charming vignettes, it is hard to imagine that Herman Meulemans had a great knowledge of modern music and was an admirer of Bartok. In his insert notes, Denijs Dille, honorary director of the Bartok Archives in Budapest, recalls that it was Herman Meulemans who kindled his interest in early 20^th Century music and in Bartok’s music.

So, in short, attractive works in excellent performances and good recording. Well worth having, were it only to have an idea of Arthur Meulemans’ music in its lighter mood. It certainly whets the appetite for more recordings of Arthur Meulemans’ works. Incidentally, PHAEDRA is planning another disc entirely devoted to short orchestral works of Arthur Meulemans.

Hubert Culot

NOTE

Information concerning PHAEDRA CDs may be obtained in writing from the following address :

Vzw Klassieke Concerten – Phaedra CD

Donkerstraat 51

B-9120 BEVEREN

Belgium

Or by browsing through their website www.phaedracd.com

Return to Index