All of these composers were professors of Music 
                at Harvard and the quartet, while now in residence at the North 
                Carolina School-of-the-Arts, were for nine years in residence 
                at Harvard University. 
              
 
              
The String Quartet No. 1 is the most substantial 
                work I’ve heard from Walter Piston, my only musical acquaintance 
                with whom to date has been through his orchestral works. While 
                I rather liked the Munch recording of the 6th Symphony, I’ve never 
                cared for The Incredible Flutist. I heard Piston speak 
                at a seminar once in the late 1950s long after he had become an 
                establishment professor type, and he delivered a clever talk disparaging 
                electronic music, a safe topic since no one within miles would 
                dream of disagreeing with him. This work from the 1930s is much 
                more adventuresome that I’d expected — non-derivative, complex 
                and well crafted, neither pretty nor abrasive. "American 
                Style" makes only the merest shadow of an appearance. The 
                slow movement particularly is exceptional and unlike anything 
                else. The moto perpetuo finale is very entertaining. This 
                is the jewel of this recording and is very much worth hearing 
                if you like modern quartet music. 
              
 
              
The Kirchner is a little less architectural, 
                more experimental and exploratory, and slightly less successful 
                a work than the Piston, although the last movement comes off very 
                well. 
              
 
              
Kim’s soprano songs are not tuneful, but effectively 
                express the sad mood of the poems, two by Verlaine (En Sourdine, 
                Colloque sentimental), one by Baudelaire (Recueillement), 
                by means of long, lush, consonant lyrical phrases. The soprano 
                has a somewhat more live acoustic than the accompanying quartet, 
                leading one to wonder if the tracks were recorded on different 
                occasions. The booklet translations are accurate and pretty much 
                word-for-word literal, which is a good idea when one wants to 
                follow the words as sung. 
              
 
              
The Bernard Rands work was written for the Mendelssohn 
                Quartet. It has a dark mood and contains self important dramatic 
                gestures but is not so successful overall. 
              
 
              
The Davidovsky piece (also written for the Mendelssohn 
                Quartet) is inspired by, and utilises some motifs from, Beethoven’s 
                Quartet No.15, Op 132, and is subtitled "Dank an Opus 132," 
                perhaps a nod back 100 years when every American composer of note 
                studied in Germany. Inviting a comparison with Beethoven is a 
                very brave thing to do and perhaps has the utility of directing 
                your attention away from Schoenberg’s Verklaerte Nacht, 
                etc., which seems to have been very much on the composer’s mind. 
                I have always felt that the Beethoven late quartets are the source 
                of dodecaphonic style, and this work seems to substantiate that 
                observation of mine, although what we have here is not strict 
                serialism. It is however very much in the style of modern quartet 
                music, measured and cut off the bolt. Since it isn’t pretty or 
                dramatic, it is difficult to keep one’s attention on it, and one 
                is not motivated to forgive it much however carefully it may have 
                been crafted. 
              
 
              
While all this music on this disc is interesting, 
                I think that after you’ve had it a while you will probably not 
                play the Rands or Davidovsky works very often. 
              
 
              
The beauty of the SACD tracks is that there is 
                "air" around every instrument, and since some of the 
                writing is warmly consonant, some intentionally dissonant, it 
                is important that the string texture be accurately reproduced, 
                as on the SACD tracks. In the soprano songs this is particularly 
                critical since the vocalist and instruments play in the same register, 
                and on the CD tracks tend to merge into a single sound, even though 
                soloist and accompaniment seem to be in different rooms acoustically. 
                But if you’d never heard the SACD tracks, you’d be very pleased 
                with the sound on the CD tracks, so it makes sense to buy this 
                disk and enjoy it in the meantime even if you don’t presently 
                have an SACD player. 
              
 
              
On either set of tracks the surround sound is 
                strictly auditorium image with instruments in front and subtle 
                reverberation from the rear speakers, so subtle in fact that you 
                may prefer to listen to the two channel version with your ambient 
                processor turned on. 
              
Paul Shoemaker