The English renaissance is fairly well-trodden ground 
          for recordings these days, but it was an era of such tremendous fecundity 
          that there is still much of interest to be explored. Strangely, it is 
          the secular music that has perhaps been less recorded than the sacred 
          choral repertoire. Of the keyboard music of that great era, collections 
          such as the famous Fitzwilliam Virginal Book or the huge Byrd 
          collection in My Ladye Neville's Book have become well known. 
          This interesting disc by Derek Adlam explores some of the major keyboard 
          works of two composers whose reputation has not become quite so great 
          as that of the Byrds or the Dowlands. John Bull and Giles Farnaby are, 
          however, probably the most innovative of the keyboard composers of their 
          time. Both specialist composers of keyboard music they managed to extend 
          the existing genres of their era and explore domestic keyboard music 
          in all its guises without ever loosing the sense of spectacle which 
          makes this repertoire so enjoyable to listen to. John Bull, in particular, 
          is a composer well worth exploration, and this disc starts with what 
          must rate as one of the most remarkable keyboard compositions before 
          the time of Bach - Bull's giant fantasy variations on the popular tune 
          As I went to Walsingham. This little ditty was quite frequently 
          used as a keyboard model, but never to the extent that Bull manages. 
          Adlam takes nearly 20 minutes at no sluggish tempo to perform this masterpiece. 
          In it, Bull contrives to subject his material to every possible ornamental 
          device using the practice of division writing; replacing slower 
          moving note values with strings of ever shorter notes. The technical 
          skill is undeniable, but the arrangement of the 30 variations provides 
          a large scale formal structure of great grandeur. Adlam's pacing and 
          sense of the unfolding of the architecture is very convincing. 
        
 
        
The other large scale works of John Bull are better 
          known; the Fantasy on Ut re me fa sol la uses a simple scale 
          as the main musical material while the In Nomine IX uses a fragment 
          of plainsong from the Benedictus section of a mass by Taverner. This 
          work is written in the odd time of 11/4 - an irregularity which, combined 
          with the dazzling technical writing, makes the work hugely enjoyable. 
          These are performed on stringed instruments from Derek Adlam's own workshop, 
          tuned in expressive unequal temperaments. This does give an unsettling 
          effect when first heard; there is a sense of parts being simply 'out 
          of tune' and yet it must be understood that this variation in tuning 
          is all part of the colourful world of this repertoire which we loose 
          if we render everything into the equal temperament of the modern piano. 
          Tracks 2-4 use a small organ, of the type that would have accompanied 
          the choir in a large church, for performance of another Bull In Nomine 
          and a Salvator Mundi, the type of music that could have filled 
          parts of the service in church as well as being suitable for domestic 
          use. The organ is tuned in a different temperament to the harpsichord 
          creating a somewhat uncomfortable shift between tracks 1 and 2, but 
          the ear soon acclimatises to the different flavour. 
        
 
        
Giles Farnaby was the same age as Bull, but his training 
          and career were very different. He was largely self taught as a musician, 
          being a joiner by trade. It is possible that he was a builder of keyboard 
          instruments. He may have been a pupil of Bull at some stage, and is 
          probably no coincidence that Farnaby was admitted Bachelor of Music 
          in the University of Oxford the same day in 1592 that Bull became Doctor 
          of Music in the same university. Derek Adlam's booklet notes speak in 
          slightly disparaging vein about the talent of Farnaby, alleging that 
          his "skill as a composer is limited, and his technical gifts slight" 
          but then declares that "his variations on the tune Woody-cock 
          are one of the best of all sets of English keyboard variations..." Farnaby's 
          output may have been less than that of Bull or Byrd, but to criticise 
          him for not sounding like either of those masters seems strange. Indeed, 
          Adlam's performance of the Woody-cock variations shows no sign 
          of his not being convinced of Farnaby's gifts. There is a broad nobility 
          in the pace and a generous shaping of the phrases and cadences that 
          allows the essential grandeur of the simple tune to come across. Similarly 
          the virtuoso performances of Kempe's Morris and The King's 
          Hunt employing a muselar virginals (an instrument with the 
          strings plucked close to their ends, giving a characteristic flutey 
          sound) with rattling metal hooks attached to the bass strings in the 
          former, show the sense of verve that infuses a lot of Farnaby's music. 
          Obviously Adlam has spent many years with this repertoire and is well 
          versed in the subtleties that bring out its more human side. It has 
          often been suggested that it is humanity which is lacking from this 
          technically demanding music, but in the hands of a sensitive performer 
          with intimate knowledge of the instruments for which the music was written 
          there is plenty to enjoy in this delicate, yet never lightweight, repertoire. 
        
 
        
Peter Wells