HANDLEY’S
FIRST BAX 4th (CONCERT ARTIST)
Reviewed by Christopher Webber
THE SIR ARNOLD BAX WEB SITE
Last Modified 8th October 2004

Guildford Philarmonic Orchestra
Vernon Handley (conductor)
Arnold Bax: Symphony No.4
E. J. Moeran: Serenade in G major
Concert Artist CACD 9009-2 (56:15, rec. 1964)
Despite its popularity during the composer's lifetime, Bax's Symphony
No.4 is critically least prized of his seven. Its mercurial,
often extrovert moods, sun-streaked ebullience and triumphal close
may lie at the root of both criticism and quondam popular success.
Even Vernon Handley has been guarded: “We all say that this is the
weakest of the seven symphonies; but one must allow that in every
symphonic canon a fine symphonic composer has the right to be a bit
bluff and happy now and then.” ¹
Given such pallid praise from Bax's greatest champion, it's ironic
that thus far the 4th is the only one of the seven which Handley has
had the chance to record twice.
By 1964 the young maestro had raised up the Guildford
Philharmonic Orchestra—composed at that time partly of local
amateurs with heavy professional stiffening—to the point where it
was able to face the technical challenge of Bax's symphonies. The
fledgling Concert Artist company took the opportunity to set down
their interpretation of the 4th. This was an important recording,
only the second of any Bax symphony, and the first in stereo. The LP
was later reissued by Revolution, and Concert Artist/Fidelio
themselves produced a high quality tape cassette version, in
infinitely superior sound. Now the renascent company has restored
Handley's first version to the catalogue, and very exciting it
proves, coupled with a sturdy performance of Moeran's Serenade.
To anyone only familiar with the old LP, the CD's full dynamic
range and open sound will come as a revelation. The prescribed organ
underscoring the climaxes of the 1st and 3rd movements remains
inaudible, but otherwise Concert Artist's oil-painting ambience
compares well against others of its time. The performance sounds
literally twice as good as it did. It's now possible to hear that
some negative comment about the orchestra arose from the
constrained, acid quality of that LP sound rather than the playing
itself. The woodwind sound woody, the brass brassy, all of which
adds to the performance's comfortably period character; and if the
strings occasionally sound … well, stringy, Handley as so often
inspired his forces to play above themselves. There are one or two
moments where choice seems dictated by the capabilities of this or
that individual player, but on the whole remarkably few allowances
have to made if we're to measure his 1964 achievement in Guildford
against the 2002 Manchester remake.
Handley's relative fleetness of foot in recent Bax performances
is evident from the timings. In 1964 he took 5% longer over the main
meat of the first movement. This is more down to sparing use of rubato
than basic difference in tempo, but the feeling is different:
Guildford's authentically bluff, hearty bonhomie is set against
Manchester 's compelling musical through-line and subtlety of
detail. The slow movement was marginally quicker in
1964—surprisingly, as some laboured articulation and solo playing
detract from the wonder of Bax's twilit rockpool-world. Bax's
magical writing for glockenspiel and celeste is heavily spotlit, but
this—unlike the sudden sonic cut-off at the end of the
movement—is a matter of recording taste.
With the last movement—nearly 10% slower in 1964—there's an
appreciable difference, and one that tells in Guildford 's favour.
The opening, with its trilling trumpets and sunburst confidence,
benefits from the heavy-armour tread, whilst the later miniature
Celtic jig-march for flute and harp sounds less quaintly
characterful, more homogenised in the sleeker Manchester
performance. Of the triumphal ending itself Handley has said: “If
one does that sort of thing—and Bax does it thoroughly—that is,
choose against subtlety, then one will have chosen to do so for a
reason.”¹ There's plenty of reason
revealed by both his performances, and the organ's added bass
sonorities in Manchester are breathtaking. The triumphant
homecoming, though, is more movingly conveyed by the Guildford
players at their slower tempo.
My head tells me that the new, Chandos version has to be the
Handley 4th of choice. The more natural recording has greater
dynamic range, the playing is more consistently excellent, Handley's
interpretation is if anything deeper and certainly more refined.
However, this Guildford record has special qualities which aren't
lightly dismissed. It has solid good humour, many loving touches in
phrasing, a distinctively strong colour and character; and in
allowing Bax's “choice against subtlety” in the last movement
freer reign, the young 1964 Handley maybe came closer to the heart
of what is surely Bax's most spirited symphonic spectacular, warts
and all. It's good to be able to hear it at last in a transfer which
does the young conductor and his brave band better justice.
© Christopher Webber 2004
[¹ From Vernon Handley's
interview with Lewis Foreman, in the notes to the complete Chandos
set.]
|
 |