Beethoven: Gerard Schwarz, cond., John Lill,
Seattle Symphony, Benaroya Hall, 
Seattle, 
1.03.2007 (BJ)
 
Whizz-kids of the piano come and go. In some cases they grow into artists of 
distinction, in others they go as soon as they came, and in all too many 
instances they acquire careers out of proportion to their exiguous talents. 
Meanwhile, without perhaps ever becoming household names à la Horowitz or 
Rubinstein, fine musicians like John Lill go on playing wonderfully year after 
year. So it was a pleasure to welcome this English pianist to 
Seattle 
for a pair of programs encompassing all five of Beethoven’s concertos for his 
instrument.
At the first of these concerts, supported with gusto and near-perfect unanimity 
by the Seattle Symphony under its music director, Gerard Schwarz, Lill showed 
yet again why he is widely regarded as a musicians’ musician. The two works on 
this program were the Fourth and Fifth concertos, and I do not think I have ever 
heard a pair of performances that so expertly delineated their sharply 
contrasted characters. In the Fourth Concerto before intermission Lill took 
every opportunity to relax the pulse and refine the dynamics in response to 
every poetic impulse in this supremely poetic score. This was music-making in 
the grand manner, realized with tone that ranged from the occasional thunderous 
(but never harsh) fortissimo to a ravishingly soft (but never 
exaggerated) pianissimo. Lill’s penchant here for slowing down at crucial 
“plot points” was evidence of daring–but where the Pogoreliches and Lang Langs 
of this world impose their interpretative ideas on the music from outside, Lill 
drew his from a profound identification with what Beethoven wrote, and with the 
tradition he worked in.
I waited with fascination, then, to hear how he would approach the bigger, more 
assertive, and altogether more outward-oriented Fifth Concerto. In the event, 
just as his delicacy in No. 4 was never allowed to undercut the power of the 
climaxes, so in No. 5 pianissimo touches were never lacking at the right 
moments, while the huge declarative statements of such passages as the 
cadenza-like flourishes that set the first moment on its course were delivered 
with truly astonishing strength and solidity, and with a freedom from the 
tyranny of the bar-line that attained spontaneity without obscuring the arc of 
the solo line. Rhythmically, too, the performance took an opposite tack to what 
we had heard in No. 4. This time, even in passages like the first movement’s 
subordinate theme where pianists often enjoy pausing to enjoy the scenery, Lill 
kept the music moving eagerly ahead.
There were two places, one in each concerto, that might with advantage have been 
done differently. In one of the episodes in the Fourth Concerto’s finale, I 
would have enjoyed, under the beautifully shaped treble line, a little more 
emphasis on the magically propulsive left-hand part. And the slow movement of 
No. 5 was, I felt, just a little too slow, having the effect of four 
beats to the measure rather than Beethoven’s indicated alla breve meter. 
But the near-immobility Lill and Schwarz fashioned did have the result that the 
first measures of the finale came as a genuinely thrilling explosion under 
Lill’s hands. In any case, these were minor points that in no substantial way 
diminished the splendor of the occasion.
 
 
Bernard 
Jacobson