PROM 39:  Mendelssohn, 
                    ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream - Overture and Incidental Music:  
                    Beethoven, Symphony no. 5, Mary Nelson, Victoria Simmonds, 
                    Methodist College Belfast Girls’ Choir, Ulster Orchestra, 
                    Thierry Fischer, conductor, Royal Albert Hall, 13 August, 
                    2005  (ME) 
                   
                   
                  You 
                    always get a great ovation at the Proms, especially if you 
                    programme as enticingly as this, even if the performance lacks 
                    fire - the Ulster Orchestra must have been well pleased with 
                    their reception, but the problem was that they couldn’t quite 
                    deliver what their conductor, the on-the-rise Thierry Fischer, 
                    seemed to want of them. 
                   
                  Mendelssohn’s 
                    incidental music for ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’ is of course 
                    more often heard as isolated fragments such as the Wedding 
                    March, so it was good to hear it – or most of it – as a whole, 
                    especially in the context of this year’s ‘Fairy Tales’ theme 
                    which highlighted the obvious links to Purcell’s ‘Faerie Queene.’  The wonderful 
                    Overture, written when the composer was only seventeen, was 
                    played with great delicacy, the sweeping strings of the coda 
                    (to my ears the best music Mendelssohn ever wrote) ideally 
                    evoking the sadness of the lovers’ quarrels, but the orchestra 
                    often seemed to have difficulty in providing what the conductor 
                    seemed to want; it was as though his ambitions were going 
                    one way and theirs in a quite different, perhaps less driven 
                    direction. The two soloists sang sweetly and the girls’ choir 
                    provided incisive, well-trained singing, but the vocal parts 
                    seemed to lack mystery or imagination here.
                   
                  Beethoven’s 
                    5th is always a hit, even if the rendition is not 
                    especially distinguished: there was nothing exactly wrong 
                    with either the playing or the direction here, just the sense 
                    that this is so familiar a piece that it really needs a bit 
                    more than ‘just’ accuracy and good judgment in performance. 
                    The obvious problems were that there was little sense of the 
                    great dramatic plan of the work in evidence, and it did not 
                    help that there was some squally intonation from the brass 
                    and woodwind: the best playing came in the Andante, but the 
                    Allegro’s theme seemed to take an eternity to emerge. The 
                    audience reacted as though they had been hearing the work 
                    for the first time, which is heart-warming in a way - the 
                    greatness of the work transcending the limitations of the 
                    performance. 
                   
                   
                  Melanie 
                    Eskenazi