Seen and Heard 
              International Concert Review
             
            The London Philharmonic Orchestra in 
            Athens: Beethoven Cycle, Soloists, London Philharmonic 
            Orchestra, Kurt Masur, Megaron, Athens, 12th to 15th January 2005 
            (ARi) 
 
            
              Ludwig van Beethoven:
              Symphony No. 1 in C Major, Op. 21 (1800) 
              Symphony No. 2 in D Major, Op. 36 (1802) 
              Symphony No. 3 "Eroica" in E Flat Major, Op. 55 (1803) 
              
              12th January 2005
            
              Symphony No. 4 in B Flat Major, Op. 60 (1806) 
              Symphony No. 5 in C minor, Op. 67 (1807) 
              13th January 2005
            
              Symphony No. 6 "Pastoral" in F Major, Op. 68 (1808) 
              Symphony No. 7 in A Major, Op. 92 (1812) 
              14th January 2005
            
              Symphony No. 8 in F Major, Op. 93 (1812) 
              Symphony No. 9 "Choral" in D minor, Op. 125 (1824) 
              Christine Brewer (soprano)
              Carolin Masur (mezzo soprano)
              Thomas Studebaker (tenor)
              Alastair Miles (bass)
              London Philharmonic Choir
            Manolis Kalomiris” Children Choir
              15th January 2005
            
              After an unsuccessful attempt to present the complete Beethoven 
              symphonies in Athens two years ago, and after the very good Brahms 
              cycle of last year, the London Philharmonic Orchestra and Kurt Masur 
              offered the Athens audience Beethoven’s symphonic legacy in 
              four sold-out concerts. 
             
            
            
              In the opening movement of the First Symphony the orchestra’s 
              reading was elegant but Masur’s approach, despite the very 
              fast tempi, failed to convey the overall feeling of gaiety and happiness. 
              The same was also true of the third movement, except perhaps for 
              a very successful dialogue between the winds and strings in the 
              Trio. The final movement was the most successful of all with beautiful 
              phrasing from the second violins.
            
              The Second Symphony’s slow introduction brought with it gentle 
              statements from the winds and the main theme of the allegro 
              con brio section underlined beautifully the energetic and cheerful 
              character of the music. The lyrical theme of the second movement 
              had grace, lightness and exceptionally well-phrased statements from 
              the horns and bassoon. After an indifferent scherzo, a perfect, 
              thunderous rondo followed, its impressive first theme performed 
              furiously, as it should be. Clarinet and bassoon introduced lyrically 
              the second theme, and this was well contrasted with the explosive 
              repeat of the first theme.
            
              The introductory first two chords of the Eroica were played 
              in tempo and with weighty significance; but the main theme simply 
              lacked heroic tension. I have never understood how - and why - certain 
              conductors appear so restrained here, as if they are not overwhelmed 
              by this stormy music. The orchestra’s playing was largely 
              without contrast, and this was especially so when the second theme 
              emerged from the winds to be taken up by the first violins. The 
              recapitulation featured very good playing by the horns, however. 
              The Funeral March was understated and the crescendo not 
              sufficiently weighty. The third movement was very well articulated 
              but the winds solos were quite often approximate; pizzicati in the 
              finale’s introductory theme were impressively accurate. However, 
              this was a performance which gave little, or no, opportunity to 
              experience the score’s triumphant character.
            
              The joyfulness of the Fourth Symphony’s introductory movement 
              did not emerge in Masur’s reading, which appeared stiff and 
              lacked a bel canto quality. However, the flute was exceptionally 
              fine and the string attacks well rehearsed. The slow movement enraptured 
              the audience immediately; it remained totally silent throughout 
              its duration. Both orchestra and maestro were incredibly concentrated 
              and offered us moments of pure emotion and tenderness. The Scherzo 
              was played satisfactorily but without any contrasting effects between 
              the minuet and trio. The finale lacked the enthusiastic treatment 
              I prefer in this work.
              
              The Fifth Symphony’s first movement received a fabulous, straight-forward 
              reading full of genuine passion and fire; miraculously, Masur left 
              the orchestra time and space to breathe. The serenity of the following 
              movement was happily interrupted by a powerful, and elaborately 
              phrased crescendi. The scherzo was introduced by dark and warm celli 
              leading to a quite impressive performance of the fugato Trio section. 
              The transition to the final movement was in the spirit of Masur’s 
              overall conception of this particular work, avoiding the rallentandi 
              very often used (and misused) by others in this section - although 
              I was tempted to prefer a little more suspense. The final movement 
              was full of character, brio, grandeur and orchestral precision; 
              a real delight for the mind and the heart and the peak of the cycle 
              so far.
            
              The third day opened with the Pastoral. The introductory 
              movement was played in an ideal tempo, and both orchestra and conductor 
              stated the popular themes nicely with great playing from the strings. 
              The second movement advanced steadily and in an unaltered tempo 
              until the end, with beautiful contributions from the wind soloists. 
              The horns sounded a little too loud in the third movement but had 
              a charming and warm tone. The tempest burst naturally - but not 
              wildly – with Masur preferring to let the music to speak for 
              itself. The finale, unfortunately, was rather cold and indifferent; 
              if only the orchestra’s strings and admirable woodwinds hade 
              been allowed more involvement! 
            
              The poco sostenuto introduction to the Seventh Symphony 
              should have been more involved and sustained in order to contrast 
              with the flute solo (played without grace) in the exposition of 
              the principal theme of the movement’s main body. But these 
              were the only unwelcome aspects of Masur’s interpretation 
              and the orchestra’s performance; it emerged into an unforgettable 
              experience. Incredible tutti were sung and danced in lively tempi, 
              bringing us into a world of total happiness and joy. In contrast, 
              the ritual dances of the second movement were very strict rhythmically 
              and were supported by an orchestra in exstasis. The scherzo was 
              performed brilliantly, respecting the presto indication set by the 
              composer, and if the Trio was on the fast side it was notable for 
              a great contribution from trumpets playing to their limits. Almost 
              without a break - and without any sign of fatigue - the orchestra 
              released their rich reserves and offered us a fast and generous 
              conclusion to this symphony. A technically impressive and exhilarating 
              account that will linger long in the memory.
             
            The Eighth symphony, which opened the last day 
              of this cycle (preceded by a welcome greeting in Greek from Kurt 
              Masur to Mikis Theodorakis who was present in the hall), seemed 
              to be less well rehearsed than the others since quite often we encountered 
              unclear sonorities and weak balances. Nevertheless, the second movement 
              was noble and gentle, and masterly constructed and executed. The 
              third movement suffered from some orchestral inaccuracies and it 
              was unfortunate that the horns sounded insecure. The final movement 
              succeeded only due to the strings’ impeccable playing.
            
              The first measures of the Ninth defined the grandeur of the performance. 
              Lively tempi, together with a sense of understanding of the movement’s 
              complex inner architecture, gave this movement the epic character 
              it deserves. The sharp fortissimo beats that introduced the second 
              movement, together with the impulse and power that governed the 
              scherzo, convinced me that his Ninth would be the best I had ever 
              experienced in a concert. The slow movement was notable for disarming 
              phrasing and simplicity. The second violins and violas could not 
              have underlined any better the serenity of the divine second theme, 
              this masterpiece’s humanitarian message being clearly conveyed 
              to the audience. I think Masur managed to find the golden rule between 
              the late romantic and historically informed approaches. Without 
              metaphysical demonstration, the orchestra stated dramatically the 
              “fanfare of terror” and expressed perfectly all the 
              movement’s different moods until the first statement of the 
              main theme, “Ode to Joy” on the woodwinds. The quartet 
              of soloists had a rare homogeneity, which was immediately noticeable. 
              Together with the incredibly accurate Choir we lived moments of 
              grace, inspiration and happiness. The audience honored this important 
              event with long ovations and as the Maestro told me backstage he 
              wishes to come back next year with a Schumann cycle. 
             
            Alexandros Rigas
             
            