Charlecote Park

Fabric of Britain – The Story of Wallpaper on BBC4. Presenter Paul Martin. September 2013.
(I have also incorporated additional information gleaned from Wallpaper in Interior decoration by Gill Saunders ISBN 0-8230-5622-8. I will deposit a copy of this book in the tea-room)

Have you ever entered a room and stopped the conversation? Well it seems that I have discovered the perfect conversation stopper. At a BBQ a group were discussing what they had been watching on TV so I asked if anyone had watched the programme on the History of Wallpaper. This was greeted with open-mouthed astonishment followed by embarrassed tittering.

Nevertheless the loss was theirs as the programme itself was extremely interesting so below I present a summary in case you missed it.

The story of wallpaper in Britain goes back to the Sixteenth century. Sheets of printed paper were being sold by stationers for lining boxes and drawers. People started hanging these on the walls. If they trimmed the sides of the paper they were able to match the patterns. Samples of such paper have been found in Temple Newsam House, Leeds dating from 1670. This became so popular that special papers for walls were printed and were known as paper hangings and aped silk damasks, tapestries and embroidery used by the aristocracy. The papers literally did hang in the same way that fabrics were hung. They were tacked up top and bottom and down the sides but not glued. The edge of one paper was cut and used to overlap the unprinted side of the next sheet. Hangings of this type from the 1670s can be seen at Ham House near Richmond Surrey. The tacks were hidden by paper borders. These borders soon became decorative features in their own right. I have not found out how the borders were mounted but if their role was to hide the tacks they must have been glued rather than tacked. Gill Saunders references the use of glue in 1734 ( a paste of best flour and water)

Papers continued to have overlapped sides right up to 1914 when it was superseded by the butt joint we use today. Heavier papers required a stronger paste which was achieved by adding gelatine, gum arabic or animal glue. For heavy flocks a pure scotch glue was made from animal hoof and horn, this has the advantage that the papers are more easily removed from the wall later.. When papers were glued directly onto the wall damp was often a problem causing discolouration so the lining paper was introduced. James Arrowsmith in the Paper Hanger's and Upholsters Guide (1840) recommends the use of battens and canvas as a protection against damp. This also made the papers portable. It was commonplace to paste new papers on top of old papers. This help to smooth out any irregularities in the walls but is also why we can sometimes see evidence of the early papers in old houses – as many as 22 layers have been found.

Not all wallpapers were cheap. Upmarket papers were made of flock, imitating silk velvet. Eighteenth century British flock wallpapers became the envy of the world and were even exported to France who traditionally exported their papers to us. Originally papers were prepared in individual sheets but then sheets were linked by folding and compressing the ends with animal glue to create much longer sheets that could be wound on a roll for printing by machine. The standard width was 21 inches. Only later were continuous rolls manufactured. To make a flock the background colour was applied to the paper. Four coats of colour were applied followed by a gloss coat to give a sheen. The pattern was then applied by wooden engraved blocks with the pattern in relief. When papers were originally made in sheets the pattern had to be quite short but, with the invention of the roll, patterns could be much longer – in fact as long as needed. The flock pattern wooden block was coated in a slow drying paint or glue which was applied to the paper and the flock sticks to that. Originally flock was hand-cut wool which was fairly long and led to an uneven finish. Eventually flock was prepared by grinding wool which gave a much finer flock.

An interesting point which was not touched upon in the programme is that there was a wallpaper tax in this country. It was introduced in 1712 at a rate of one penny per square yard but this rose in stages to one shilling a square yard and effectively stopped the production of British wallpaper. The tax was abolished in 1836 for British papers but imported papers were taxed for a further 25 years.

There are two records of papers used at Charlecote:

Chris Purvis has given me the following information he found in the Warwick records Office
Extract of a letter from Willement to George Lucy, dated February 17 1832

Sir,

I have sent off Mr Waggen (directed to you at Stratford on Avon) the following quantities of paper, which I

believe you will find according to your order.

28 pieces of 12 yds 336 yds Crimson for three rooms

25 do do 300 yds Green & Metal for large bedroom & two .... rooms

17 do do 204 yds Satin for yellow room and turret

I suppose your paper hanger is accustomed to the hanging of Flock and Metal paper, which require very great care, and they should have very smooth and stout lining paper under them; and the joints well rubbed down before the printed paper is applied. I trust that if well ….

These papers were used in the South Wing and would have been subject to the Wallpaper tax

Ted Veitch says the Charlecote Dining room flock paper was designed by Willement and matches the carpet. It came as 23 hand-printed pieces in 1837 and cost £71 17s 6d which included the hanging. The paper-hangers came up from London with the paper. This paper avoided the Wallpaper tax. The strips were made to measure and then put on a roll for easier transport but were not printed as a roll. A backing paper was used and the the glue was horn and hoof. Ted thinks the flock was stuck on with this glue and it is the protein content that has attracted the fungal growth we see as black spots on the paper. There is no easy cure for this although the paper is vacuumed every year to remove fungal spores that might otherwise be breathed in.

A way of avoiding the wallpaper tax was to put up plain papers and then colour by hand. These were usually coloured green or blue and were known as verditer papers. These papers could also be flocked on the wall.

In the late seventeenth century Chinese hand painted papers were imported. These were an expensive luxury and were treasured because of the detailed scenes By the end of the eighteenth century every Grand House had at least one Chinese room. The papers were specifically made for the British market and not used by the Chinese themselves. British manufacturers were quick to follow with their own printed designs of Chinoiserie. There was an evergrowing range of patterns, florals, geometric patterns, stripes, patterns that looked like architecture or like pictures hung on a wall. We can tell what patterns people were choosing as there exists an order book from Cowtan & Sons covering 1824 to 1830 that has strip samples from the actual paper glued into the book.

Cowtan Order book 1836-1842 Victoria and Albert Museum

Even as late as 1830 paper was still being printed in blocks with the sheets glued together as described but then machines appeared that could manufacture continuous paper rolls with a steam powered machine being patented in 1839. By 1870 a number of different colours or patterns could be sequentially applied to the moving paper. This was done by applying colours to blankets on rollers which transferred the paint to embossed blocks which in turn applied the paint to the paper as it passed. They could produce 250 rolls an hour. By 1834 just over a million rolls of wall paper had been printed by hand. 10 years after mechanisation Britain produced 5.5 million rolls, in 1874 32 million rolls were made. Hand made paper sold at 25 shillings a roll but mechanisation brought this down to 2 pence a roll.

 

At Charlecote the youngest of the Willement wallpapers is in the bedroom. This was made in 1832 and is stamped on the back with a William IV excise duty stamp. (from a sample in the V&A)

The V&A description is Portion of wallpaper with a strap-work design; Woodblock print on paper

 


The Dining room paper dates from 1837 and is a floral arabesque on an embossed gold paper. THis V&A sample is bright and clean and does not have the mould growth from which the paper in the house suffers. Willement also used this design in the Axminster carpet made by Wilton. It is a red, blue and buff design on a russet ground. The date of manufacture is uncertain. The V&A dates it between 1828 and 1844 but it was likely made at the same time as the wallpaper.

 

The Library wallpaper is a flock strap-work design on an embossed gold ground designed by Willement in 1837. The design was inspired by the girl's dresses in the painting in the great Hall (see below). It also appears on the cushions of a suite of library chairs later covered by the National Trust in a glazed Chintz replica shortly after the house was acquired. I do not know which came first; the wallpaper or the cushions.

This same pattern appears in green in a Cowtan order book in 1837 so it was generally on sale. Cowtan were in Oxford Street, London.


Len Mullenger

On Sunday 6 October 2013 I was guide in the Billiard Room. I was chatting to a lady about the wallpapers in the house when she said her friend was a wallpaper expert; naturally I asked to speak to her friend! It turned out she was Liz Cooper and employed at Oxburgh Hall, a National Trust house; either she was in charge or was the house steward, I forget! She was a wallpaper expert. I said we understood the Billiard Room wallpaper to be a fairly standard type bought commercially in about 1956. She prefaced her remarks by saying she would not put her professional reputation on the line on the basis of a brief look but said no it was not what we thought. She ran her fingers over the paper (naughty naughty!) and said she felt it was a hand-blocked paper and more likely to be of 1856 than 1956. She was quite excited by the border and said it was definitely hand blocked and quite elaborate.

Stewart Scott